<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erin Andrews Peephole Video Demands a Proactive Hotel Industry Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/</link>
	<description>Proving Hotel &#38; Destination Marketing, Travel Technology, Quality Service &#38; Profitability Can Peacefully Coexist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-370</guid>
		<description>There are brand new, innovative products by Privacy Logic now that will solve the issues of peephole tampering.  Check out the new website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are brand new, innovative products by Privacy Logic now that will solve the issues of peephole tampering.  Check out the new website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-360</guid>
		<description>One good thing about this,(not the peephole vid) is the actions the hotels are going to take for the improvement of security and the safety social awareness, that we should be cautious at all times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One good thing about this,(not the peephole vid) is the actions the hotels are going to take for the improvement of security and the safety social awareness, that we should be cautious at all times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertKCole</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertKCole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Agree that peephole covers address the peephole, but attention is required for training to handle personal guest information in a secure manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree that peephole covers address the peephole, but attention is required for training to handle personal guest information in a secure manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zzamba007</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Zzamba007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-328</guid>
		<description>What about the hotels installing peephole covers on the inside of the guest rooms?  There&#039;s an inexpensive solution that can be installed in 30 seconds over a existing peephole.  It&#039;s available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secureguest.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.secureguest.net&lt;/a&gt; for less than $10.  I&#039;m betting this will become a standard.. like locks on doors and curtains on windows.  In light of this case, it certainly should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the hotels installing peephole covers on the inside of the guest rooms?  There&#39;s an inexpensive solution that can be installed in 30 seconds over a existing peephole.  It&#39;s available at <a href="http://www.secureguest.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.secureguest.net</a> for less than $10.  I&#39;m betting this will become a standard.. like locks on doors and curtains on windows.  In light of this case, it certainly should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hotels sued for enabling peeping tom &#124; My Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Hotels sued for enabling peeping tom &#124; My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-311</guid>
		<description>[...] For further reading, check Robert K. Cole&#8217;s excellent analysis of this situation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For further reading, check Robert K. Cole&#8217;s excellent analysis of this situation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hotels sued for enabling peeping tom &#124; SHOUTing GORIlla</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Hotels sued for enabling peeping tom &#124; SHOUTing GORIlla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-310</guid>
		<description>[...] For further reading, check Robert K. Cole&#8217;s excellent analysis of this situation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For further reading, check Robert K. Cole&#8217;s excellent analysis of this situation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertKCole</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertKCole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-114</guid>
		<description>From what I have read, yes, this individual broke the law.  Specifically, interstate stalking - a felony offense that carries a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.  Ms. Andrews also has strong grounds for a civil siut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have read, yes, this individual broke the law.  Specifically, interstate stalking &#8211; a felony offense that carries a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.  Ms. Andrews also has strong grounds for a civil siut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertKCole</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertKCole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-61</guid>
		<description>From what I have read, yes, this individual broke the law.  Specifically, interstate stalking - a felony offense that carries a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.  Ms. Andrews also has strong grounds for a civil siut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have read, yes, this individual broke the law.  Specifically, interstate stalking &#8211; a felony offense that carries a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.  Ms. Andrews also has strong grounds for a civil siut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara De Lollis</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara De Lollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Robert, Hi. Fascinating post! Thanks for pointing me to it on Friday. &lt;br&gt;I just blogged about it on my blog - USA TODAY&#039;s Hotel Check-In. &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotelcheckin.usatoday.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hotelcheckin.usatoday.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;cheers,&lt;br&gt;Barbara&lt;br&gt;direct link: &lt;a href=&quot;http://content.usatoday.com/communities/hotelcheckin/post/2009/10/68500794/1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://content.usatoday.com/communities/hotelch...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, Hi. Fascinating post! Thanks for pointing me to it on Friday. <br />I just blogged about it on my blog &#8211; USA TODAY&#39;s Hotel Check-In. <a href="http://hotelcheckin.usatoday.com" rel="nofollow">hotelcheckin.usatoday.com</a><br />cheers,<br />Barbara<br />direct link: <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/hotelcheckin/post/2009/10/68500794/1" rel="nofollow">http://content.usatoday.com/communities/hotelch&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.rockcheetah.com/blog/security/erin-andrews-peephole-video-demands-proactive-hotel-industry-response/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60</guid>
		<description>So he did some favore for the adult sites, is that a crime?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he did some favore for the adult sites, is that a crime?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 677/682 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.rockcheetah.com @ 2012-02-09 16:55:42 -->
